William Gaze snr.
millwright |
William Gaze snr.
- 1836 to 1859
|
William Gaze Sr. was born in St. Saviour's, Norwich in 1795. He was the son of Samuel_Gaze. His first marriage produced a son, William_jnr., in 1821 in Heigham. |
He was first mentioned as a millwright in White's Directory of 1836 as a partner to Thomas_Howard. He was living in St. Saviour's at this time. From 1839 to 1848 they were also in partnership with Christopher Southgate. Howard, Gaze & Southgate were listed in White's Directory of 1845 as millwrights in Back Street, St. Paul's. William Gaze is also listed as living in that street. William Gaze was listed in Hunt and Co.'s Directory of 1850 as a millwright living in Pitt Street. In 1851, William Gaze was given as a master millwright employing 11 men living in Back Street, St. Saviour's with his wife Emily, 49, sons Richard, 19, Abraham, 17, and Isaac, 15; and daughters Emily, 26, and Victoria, 12. Of the sons, Abraham was listed as a millwrights' apprentice. William Gaze was listed in White's Directory of 1854 as a millwright engineer in Back Street, St. Saviour's. After the death of both partners, William Gaze was left to run the business alone. |
WILLIAM GAZE, |
THANKING his friends for past favours, respectfully informs them that, in consequence of the decease of his late partner, Mr. Thos._Howard, the Business will in future be carried on by him in all its Branches, and solicits a continuance of those favours bestowed upon the late Firm. |
PURSUANT to a Decree in the High Court of Chancery, made in a Cause of "THOMAS HOWARD and others, Infants by the said Thomas Howard, their Brother and next Friend, against WILLIAM GAZE, and another," the Creditors of Thomas_Howard, late of Saint Paul's Back Lane, in the city of Norwich, Millwright, who died in or about the month of September, 1854, are by their Solicitors, on or before the 14th day of January, 1856, to come in and prove their Debts at the Chambers of the Master of the Rolls, in the Roll Yard, Chancery Lane, Middlesex, or in default thereof they will be peremptorily excluded from the benefit of the said Decree, Thursday, the 17th day of January, 1856, at Two o'clock in the Afternoon, at the said Chambers, is appointed for the hearing and adjudicating upon the Claims. Dated this 3rd day of December, 1855 |
GEORGE WHITING, Chief Clerk, |
Norfolk Chronicle - 8th December 1855 |
William Gaze was listed in Melville's Directory of 1856 as a millwright in Back Lane, St. Paul's. He was killed in an accident in the watermill at Wramplingham, Norfolk, on the 7th October 1859. |
DIED |
SHOCKING FATALITY AT WRAMPLINGHAM MILL |
A frightful accident occurred at Wramplingham_mill, about seven miles from Norwich, on Friday morning last. Mr. Sayer, the tenant, was about to leave, and the business was to be transferred to the landlord, Mr. Ringer, so that it was thought necessary that there should be an examination into the state of the machinery and a valuation of all the property. Mr. W. Gaze, millwright, of this city, and his son William, were engaged for this purpose, and visited the mill on Friday. They were inspecting the various parts in what is technically called the "cog pit;" and Mr. Gaze, that he might the more easily examine some particular point, seated himself on a beam between which and a temporary floor beneath (and within a few inches of each) there revolved, when that part of the works were in motion, a heavy iron wheel in a horizontal position, known as the connecting or intermediate wheel. As he sat, his legs were through the arms of the wheel, resting on the floor, which, as we have said, was but a few inches below. Just at this moment the works began to move, and the unfortunate man was drawn into the narrow space between the wheel and the beam on which he had been sitting. - a space certainly not more than three inches wide - and was crushed to death on the spot. The lower parts of his person were completely broken to atoms, and had he not been held up by his son he would have been so completely mangled as to leave no possibility of identification. The nature and cause of the accident will be better understood from a perusal of the following evidence taken at an inquest held at the King's Head, Wramplingham, on Wednesday last, before Edward Press, Esq: - Mr. Wm. Gaze, millwright and engineer, deposed - On Wednesday the 5th inst., my father and myself were engaged about seven hours in examining certain articles of a moveable character in Wramplingham Mills, with a view to value the same as between the out-going tenant and the landlord; and in order doing this we had the occasion to go about the mill in various parts, but could thus gain only a partial knowledge of the construction of the machinery. We found, however, that part of the work was driven by steam power and part by water, and that some portion was driven by either one or the other as might be convenient. The steam engine was going nearly all that day, but we found no occasion to examine it then. We made an appointment to be there again on Friday, to examine the state of the machinery. We commenced our inspection at half-past nine o'clock, by untackling the stones to examine the spindles and boxes. These stones were connected with the steam engine and could not be driven by the water power. In doing this we had the occasion to require the engine to move the stones to such a position as would enable us to take them up. The engine moved the connecting wheel about one-third round, and was then stopped. On examining the second pair of stones, it was necessary to have the connecting wheel moved again; and the same with respect to the third pair; each time the motion was but very slight one, showing that the works were under perfect control; and the motion I have no doubt was communicated by hand. We then went from the stone floor through the cog-pit which is just below, to examine the various parts of the machinery, having no means of getting to the part we wanted to without actually going through the arms of the flywheel. My father took up a sitting position on the beam which supports the bridge-tree post, with his feet standing on a temporary floor and between the arms of the connecting wheel. - the second motion wheel from the engine. The wheel was in a horizontal position. I walked between his back and the flywheel, and got upon a floor which was somewhat lower than where he sat. I made the remark, "I cannot get through here now," and he replied "Oh, crawl through there" (between the bridge-trees, which I did. At that moment the machinery began to move slowly, and my father cried out "Oh, oh, oh!" He was placed so that his right leg was instantaneously entangled, and he was drawn in. He leaned himself against the "bray-post," and I got to him as quickly as possible. I seized hold of the flywheel arm and endeavoured to stop it, pulling him at the same time with my left hand. I shouted, "Stop the flywheel!" and it was stopped in a few seconds. The connecting wheel went round about a third of its diameter. We turned the wheel back by hand, and got my father out. He was still alive, but died in the course of about a minute or two from the injuries he had received. I had been told shortly before, when on the stone floor, that the mill would draw off itself as the steam got up; but it had to be moved by hand while we inspected the stones. My opinion, however, is that my father did not understand the machinery might start itself, though I did. Noah Ottaway, one of the millers, who assisted in attending to the fire and driving the engine, was then called, and after being informed he was not obliged to say anything that would implicate himself, deposed as follows: - I was in charge of the engine till twelve o'clock on Thursday night, when I went home. I left the mill going still driven by the engine, and I returned at six o'clock on Friday morning. The mill was then going, driven by steam, but James Murrell had charge of the engine, having taken it from me at twelve, and he continued in charge till nine o'clock. I believe the Gazes came about eight, and I understood that they were going over the mill. All the machinery was stopped at nine, and the fire was taken out of the furnace. Some time afterwards - about an hour, I think - Mr. Gaze came and had the stones taken up for examination. To enable him to do this, I moved the flywheel of the engine twice by pushing it. I helped to turn the stones, and then went down into the boiler house. The deceased was there, and I asked him whether I might get the steam up to start, and he said I might. I then made a fire; but before I began to do Mr. Gaze, jun., asked whether he might put a question or two to the witness, and permission having been granted, he said - At what time was my father in the boiler-house, as I am not aware of his having been there at all? The CORONER expressed his satisfaction that witness had spoken the truth, and that therefore no blame attached to him, especially as Mr. Gaze, sen., had told him he might get the fire up, and he himself gave Mr. Gaze warning of the fact that the engine was apt to draw off. It was quite possible that Mr. Gaze might not think how quickly the steam could be got up when the water never had time to cool; and it was also quite possible, when told of his danger that young Mr. Gaze might be so intent on what he was about as not to observe what was said to him. Mr. J. H. Slack, of Norwich, engineer, deposed - I have examined the construction of the engine, but have not seen her at work; and even if I had, I am not aware that it would have made any evidence I can give more satisfactory. It is about 50 years old. She has no starting-valve, as every engine ought to have, to shut off the communication of the engine and the boiler. The throttle-valve being used for that purpose. The throttle-valve also appears to me to be defective - so much so, that when steam is generated in the boiler, and the engine has been left any way past her centre, she would be liable to draw off or start. A very light pressure of steam would start her if the stones were lightened off, as I understand they were at this time. If the fire had been taken out, as give in evidence, after the engine had been worked all night, the water would cool down very slowly, - indeed, the heat from the brickwork of the furnace would be sufficient to generate steam for a considerable time; and if a fire was made, as stated by Ottaway, sufficient power would be given very quickly to enable the engine to draw off herself, if she had been left at all past her centre. In answer to questions by the Coroner, Mr. Slack further said, - Supposing an engineer to have known that the engine was defective and that a fire was being made, it should have occurred to him that he was placing himself in great danger in getting into such a position as that occupied by Mr. Gaze. The usual way is to stop the engine at its centre when going in amongst the machinery. The wheel being in this case balanced, she would have stopped anywhere, and therefore a person might go in amongst the wheels without thinking of any danger, if the fire was down; but still the engine might go on if she had stopped past her centre. At her centre she could not have gone except someone had moved the flywheel; and in all cases, therefore, where the machinery is to be examined, it would be most prudent to set the flywheel at the centre, or to block it. If the blow-valve had been open at the time, there would have been no motion with so little steam. In shutting the engine down from work, she would be more likely to stop of herself at a safe point than if she were moved by hand. Mr. Sayer had said, in reply to questions by the coroner, that at the time of the accident he was in the mill, and hearing a cry he instinctively laid hold of the large flywheel and pressed it with great force for some time against his breast, shouting at the same time for assistance. Twice, however, it broke away from him, and he ran and opened the stop-cock at the top of the cylinder, Ottaway having already opened the blow-valve. |
William Gaze was buried in Rosary Cemetery. |
TO MILLWRIGHTS AND OTHERS |
HAVE received instruction from the Executors or Mr. WILLIAM GAZE, deceased, to SELL by AUCTION, on Friday, December 16 th , upon the Premises, Back Lane, St. Saviour's, Norwich. |
The whole of the estate was put up for sale in February 1860. |
TO MILLWRIGHTS AND ENGINEERS. |
ALL the MACHINERY, STOCK-IN-TRADE, Patterns, and other Effects, at the Premises lately occupied by Mr. Wm. Gaze, deceased. |
TO MILLWRIGHTS AND ENGINEERS. |
ALL the MACHINERY, STOCK-IN-TRADE, Patterns, and other Effects, at the Premises lately occupied by Mr. WM. GAZE, deceased; consisting of a six-horse-power steam engine and boiler, punching machine, lathes, mill stones, vices and benches, boring bits and mandrels, piling engine and crab complete, patterns, blocks and ropes, portable forge, bellows, anvils, plaster mill, blacksmith's tools, deals, cut stuff &c. |
William Gaze's youngest daughter was married on the 7th September 1866. |
MARRIED |
On Thursday last, at the Old Meeting House, by the Rev. John Hallett, Thomas, only son of Mr. Thos. Aldis, Harleston, to Victoria Elizabeth, youngest daughter of the late Mr. William Gaze, of this city. |
William Gaze's eldest daughter died 30th September 1867. |
DIED |
On Monday last, Emily, eldest daughter of the late Mr. Gaze, millwright, St. Saviour's, aged 42. |
William Gaze's wife died 19th August 1874. |
DIED |
GAZE. - On the 19th inst, Emily, widow of the late William Gaze, millwright and engineer, of this city, in the 73rd year of her age. |
If you have any memories, anecdotes or photos please let us know and we may be able to use them to update the site. By all means telephone 07836 675369 or |
All
historical material within this page © Michael Roots
|
Top of Page |
Web
design and website © Jonathan Neville, Norfolk Mills 2017 |